("Quid coniuratio est?")
I neither necessarily agree nor disagree with either all or parts of the following:
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
THE NATIONAL SECURITY QUESTIONS AND THE CLINTON PROBLEMS By Sherman H. Skolnick
Bill and Hillary Clinton may be able to "snuff out" problems that seem to pursue them both, while disguised as related to Whitewater. Their secret remedy? Both of them, or either of them separately, invoking "national security" as a bar to the independent prosecutor running after either one of them with purported federal criminal indictments.
First of all, there is the matter of top White House aide Vincent Foster, jr. He died in July 1993. Was he "suicided", that is, murdered? Foster, a law partner of Hillary, was also reportedly an official of the super-secret code-cracking factory, the National Security Agency [NSA], called, by one author, "The Puzzle Palace". In that capacity, he reportedly played a role with Systematics, a reported propriety operation of NSA. The firm purports to supply, and service, bank computer software for firms worldwide, including foreign central banks. Did Foster strategize how Systematics would reportedly use the super-duper Inslaw software called PROMIS, with its "trap door" capability, to spy on foreign banks, including one supposed to be friendly to the United States?
Several covert intelligence officials told the editor of a leading financial publication, Forbes magazine, that Systematics was reportedly a spy operation. To get the assistance of Foster, Israeli Intelligence, called "the Mossad" (that is, "the Institute"), apparently blackmailed Foster. A coded account, purportedly in his name, was set up in a bank on the Swiss- Italian border, with some $2.7 million -- supposedly traceable back to Israeli sources. Foster, reportedly, seriously violated national security by supplying Mossad with super-secret financial and other such data from the reported Systematics spy operation. A former Israeli defense security agent, Ari Ben-Menashe, contended that Robert "Bud" McFarlane was actually a Mossad operative going back to the time McFarlane was chief assistant to the then-Senator John Tower, Republican of Texas, when the Senator was chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee. That would be about 1980: same time as the notorious "October Surprise" scenario, when George Bush and William Casey reportedly arranged a dirty, secret deal, with the Iranians, to delay release of U.S. hostages so as to wreck Jimmy Carter's bid for re-election as President.
(By the way: did John Tower and his daughter die in April, 1991, as a result of a sabotaged airplane crash, just about the time Gary Sick's book, "October Surprise", was in the works? Some think that is what happened.)
Some now believe that Foster, like McFarlane, was forced to spy on U.S. super-secret data for Israel by the use of blackmail. Remember: McFarlane reportedly tried to commit suicide the night before his scheduled testimony before the congressional Iran- Contra probe.
Forbes magazine apparently spent considerable time and funds compiling what they thought was a blockbuster story about the reported spying, by Systematics, for NSA, with the help of Foster. Someone thought it proper to follow just standard journalistic procedure and submit the details of Forbes story to the White House, to get their explanation, if any. Someone else suggested that Israel might help confirm the story by releasing corroborating details, playing down their role as a form of "limited hangout" -- espionage jargon for releasing just some details of a troublesome story, to put the best face on a story that won't go away quietly.
Evidently, the Forbes editor never read crusading author George Selves' advice, through his book, "Tell The Truth And Run". (Selves, by the way, was still writing hard-hitting books at the age of 100.) Submitting the proposed story, apparently scandalizing Systematics (a private subsidiary of ALLTEL), to the White House and also, reportedly, to the Israelis, was disastrous. Just prior to the expected deadline for going to press with the story, the editor was reportedly told to turn over all his records and material gathered for the story, to be destroyed! Some who knew what was happening were wondering to themselves whether the editor's failure to turn over the data for destruction would make him unemployed. Some say he was reportedly warned that such failure would make him unemployable, that is, "blackballed" in the mainstream journalism industry.
The ramifications of the Systematics story could bring down the Clinton presidency. Just prior to Foster's death, Hillary reportedly told Foster that his spying for Israel was known; that he was about to be indicted on charges bordering on treason, making him another Jonathon Pollard.
Did the NSA give their operative, Foster, an ultimatum, a la General Erwin Rommel, World War II? That is, "Take this gun and kill yourself, you traitor, or we shall have to do it for you."
These details, all involving national security, may help explain the hesitation by the U.S. Secret Service, the U.S. Park Police, the White House, the FBI, and other federal agents, to tell, reportedly, the truth as to exactly where Foster's body was located upon death, whether he did or did not have a gun in his hand, or whether he, in fact, was murdered.
Did the NSA find it necessary to cover up the reported huge banking spy scandal, by getting Foster to be dead? Sources in the German Secret Police contend three non-German residents of Frankfurt were part of a $5 million "contract" deal to kill Foster.
While the Forbes story was being put together, the stock of parent firm, ALLTEL, listed on the New York Stock Exchange, was declining. About February 8th, 1995, the CEO and president of the firm, J.E. Steuri, also a director and senior officer, sold 48 percent of his stock, in his firm, based on reports filed with securities regulators.
At one time, Systematics had a reported serious problem with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC]. Records show that Rose Law Firm partners Hillary Rodham Clinton and Webster Hubbell were attorneys of record for the firm. Some contend they corruptly arranged to make the SEC problem go away. Note: in 1994, Hubbell, third-in-command of the Clinton Justice Department, resigned, to face federal criminal charges that he mis-appropriated several hundred thousand dollars from the Rose Law Firm and clients. Hubbell "copped a plea bargain", agreeing to finger Hillary's reported mis-application of some $47 million from federally-insured Madison Guaranty Savings & Loan of Little Rock. The independent prosecutor apparently used Hubbell's testimony, and records, to get sealed indictments on two federal criminal charges against the First Lady.
Will the unsealing of the indictments lead to resignation of the President? Turncoat Hubbell, thought to be a close crony of the Clintons, is apparently going to avoid jail because of his testimony and records he kept when Hillary told him to take them out of Foster's office to her private White House quarters. Later, he was ordered -- by her -- to destroy the records, led her to believe he did, but turned them over to the federal grand jury in independent prosecutor Kenneth Starr's probe.
Question: Can Hillary invoke "national security" in respect to Foster's records, the reported Systematics mess, and related espionage scandals?
Question: Can the federal agencies justify the Foster suicide-or- murder cover-up on the basis of "national security"?
Question: If the central bank spy scandal would cause a financial panic, would the NSA be justified in compelling the death of Foster, whether "suiciding" him or murdering him, all for "national security"?
Question: Can the President and First Lady shield themselves from federal criminal charges with a plea of so-called "national security"?
I encourage distribution of "Conspiracy Nation."
Coming to you from Illinois -- "The Land of Skolnick"